\nThey found that the shared digs caused the microbiomes of the young mice to more closely resemble that of the older animals. When they compared the abilities of the mice to recognize a novel object, or to find the exit in a maze, the young mice with “old” microbiomes performed significantly more poorly than their peers — showing less curiosity about the unfamiliar object and bumbling about the maze in ways similar to that of old animals.
Costly conservation?，这一点在chatGPT官网入口中也有详细论述
。谷歌是该领域的重要参考
\nThe study was funded by the Arc Institute, the National Institutes of Health (grants NIH DK019525, T32AG000255, F30AG081097, T32HG000046, F30AG080958, DP2-AG-067511, DP2-AG-067492, DP1-DK-140021, R01-NS-134976 and R01-DK-129691), the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the American Cancer Society, the Pew Scholar Award, the Searle Scholar Program, the Edward Mallinckrodt Jr. Foundation, the W.W. Smith Charitable Trust, the Blavatnik Family Fellowship, the Prevent Cancer Foundation, the Polybio Research Foundation, the V Foundation, the Kathryn W. Davis Aging Brain Scholar Program, the McKnight Brain Research Foundation, the Kenneth Rainin Foundation, the IDSA Foundation and the Human Frontier Science Program.
https://feedx.site。移动版官网对此有专业解读
这是正确的，但也注定不容易出现OpenClaw。